Naturally the delegates have reached agreement on the declaration language prior to the convening of the principals. How could they not? But the discontent with the document is pretty universal:
--the EU "would like to have seen a more ambitious outcome"
--Friends of the Earth finds it a "damp squib of a draft negotiating text" that shows the talks "lack the firepower needed"
--the UN Secretary General must be displeased that his Sustainable Energy for All initiative is "noted" but not "endorsed"
--water as a challenge does not seem to have generated any action.
I'd say the problem is that everyone and his/her brother had to get their agenda into the document. Perhaps the outcome is not so bad after all, considering that the goals list includes:
- food, energy and water, as noted in an earlier post;
- the green economy;
- gender equality;
- "promoting full and productive employment, decent work for all, and social protections";
- ocean conservation, including commitments to end illegal and exploitative fishing, support local small-scale fishers, and set up a process that would eventually regulate fishing and protect life on the high seas (a future post will discuss the impact of ocean issues on the Century of Scarcity);
- improvement of life in cities;
- health;
- mountains;
- forests;
- disaster risk reduction;
- small island developing states;
- chemicals and waste;
- land degradation;
- biodiversity;
- eradication of poverty;
- sustainable tourism;
- and buried within, "urgent action on unsustainable production and consumption," but without timetables or concrete actions.
Let's give a shout out to the Rio delegates for identifying the world's problems. Evidently it will be up to the rest of us to generate the solutions.
No comments:
Post a Comment